Oculon vs Legacy FP&A

Built for the speed of modern finance. Legacy FP&A platforms can handle complex planning. Oculon is built for finance teams to build, analyse and adapt as the business moves, with less implementation drag, platform administration and specialist dependency.

How Oculon compares

Both approaches can support sophisticated financial planning. The difference is how quickly finance can get started, adapt the model, understand what changed and act.

Question

Legacy FP&A

Oculon

Multidimensional modelling

Mature multidimensional modelling

Variables, formulas, drivers, dimensions and hierarchies

Scenario planning

Scenario and version planning

Branch, compare, govern and merge scenarios

Enterprise governance

Mature permissions, controls and audit capabilities

Permissions, versions, approvals, sandboxes and audit history

Time to value

Longer implementation, data mapping and model configuration

Connect your sources, define your model, start planning

Integrations

Integrations can require more mapping, middleware or implementation support

Connect finance and operating systems directly and select the tables and fields you need

Changing the plan

Larger changes can require admins, model builders or reconfiguration

Finance can change drivers, assumptions, dimensions and structures directly

Analysis & root cause

Analysis typically relies on drilling through configured reports and models

Variance → driver → explanation in one workflow

AI & agents

AI is increasingly available, usually within existing planning and reporting workflows

AI understands the financial model, builds scenarios and can propose governed changes

Continuous monitoring

Primarily report- and dashboard-led, with monitoring dependent on configuration

Automatically surfaces material changes, risks and exceptions

Insight → action

Follow-up often continues across separate workflows or execution tools

Move from analysis into scenarios, approvals and governed workflows

Day-to-day administration

Can involve dedicated admins, model builders or platform owners

Designed for finance teams to work directly

Total cost of ownership

Licence + implementation + administration + maintenance + partner or consultant support

Lower implementation and ongoing platform overhead

When should you consider switching?

When updating a planning platform takes more time than decision-making, the tool has become the bottleneck.

Signal 01

The plan is always catching up

Changes in entities, structures or assumptions take too long to reflect in the model.

Signal 02

New questions require new setup

Getting an answer means building another report, view or model before analysis can begin.

Signal 03

Scale creates more overhead

More teams, scenarios and complexity bring more administration, configuration and specialist support.

Signal 04

The real cost keeps growing

Implementation, maintenance, administration and specialist support make the platform increasingly expensive to run.

Questions finance teams ask before switching.

No. Oculon connects to the financial and operating systems you already use, so your source systems can remain in place. Finance can select the data it needs and use it across modelling, planning and analysis.

How long does implementation take?

What happens to our existing models and planning logic?

Do we need a dedicated implementation partner or platform admin?

Can Oculon handle complex and highly customised financial models?

Can non-finance teams use Oculon?

How does Oculon pricing compare with legacy FP&A platforms?

How are changes controlled and audited?

Can AI change our financial models automatically?

Is our financial data secure?

A seamless switch

Switch to a modern finance workspace without replacing the systems your business already runs on or taking on another big-bang implementation.

1

Connect the systems you already use

Bring your financial and operational data into Oculon by connecting directly to the systems your business already runs on.

Explore integrations

2

Define your finance context

Set the metrics, dimensions, drivers, formulas and structures that reflect how your business actually works.

3

Start planning

Start with the planning, modelling or reporting workflow that matters most. Get it working in Oculon, then expand from there as your needs grow.

Request Demo

Oculon vs Legacy FP&A

Built for the speed of modern finance. Legacy FP&A platforms can handle complex planning. Oculon is built for finance teams to build, analyse and adapt as the business moves, with less implementation drag, platform administration and specialist dependency.

How Oculon compares

Both approaches can support sophisticated financial planning. The difference is how quickly finance can get started, adapt the model, understand what changed and act.

Question

Legacy FP&A

Oculon

Multidimensional modelling

Mature multidimensional modelling

Variables, formulas, drivers, dimensions and hierarchies

Scenario planning

Scenario and version planning

Branch, compare, govern and merge scenarios

Enterprise governance

Mature permissions, controls and audit capabilities

Permissions, versions, approvals, sandboxes and audit history

Time to value

Longer implementation, data mapping and model configuration

Connect your sources, define your model, start planning

Integrations

Integrations can require more mapping, middleware or implementation support

Connect finance and operating systems directly and select the tables and fields you need

Changing the plan

Larger changes can require admins, model builders or reconfiguration

Finance can change drivers, assumptions, dimensions and structures directly

Analysis & root cause

Analysis typically relies on drilling through configured reports and models

Variance → driver → explanation in one workflow

AI & agents

AI is increasingly available, usually within existing planning and reporting workflows

AI understands the financial model, builds scenarios and can propose governed changes

Continuous monitoring

Primarily report- and dashboard-led, with monitoring dependent on configuration

Automatically surfaces material changes, risks and exceptions

Insight → action

Follow-up often continues across separate workflows or execution tools

Move from analysis into scenarios, approvals and governed workflows

Day-to-day administration

Can involve dedicated admins, model builders or platform owners

Designed for finance teams to work directly

Total cost of ownership

Licence + implementation + administration + maintenance + partner or consultant support

Lower implementation and ongoing platform overhead

When should you consider switching?

When updating a planning platform takes more time than decision-making, the tool has become the bottleneck.

Signal 01

The plan is always catching up

Changes in entities, structures or assumptions take too long to reflect in the model.

Signal 02

New questions require new setup

Getting an answer means building another report, view or model before analysis can begin.

Signal 03

Scale creates more overhead

More teams, scenarios and complexity bring more administration, configuration and specialist support.

Signal 04

The real cost keeps growing

Implementation, maintenance, administration and specialist support make the platform increasingly expensive to run.

Questions finance teams ask before switching.

No. Oculon connects to the financial and operating systems you already use, so your source systems can remain in place. Finance can select the data it needs and use it across modelling, planning and analysis.

How long does implementation take?

What happens to our existing models and planning logic?

Do we need a dedicated implementation partner or platform admin?

Can Oculon handle complex and highly customised financial models?

Can non-finance teams use Oculon?

How does Oculon pricing compare with legacy FP&A platforms?

How are changes controlled and audited?

Can AI change our financial models automatically?

Is our financial data secure?

A seamless switch

Switch to a modern finance workspace without replacing the systems your business already runs on or taking on another big-bang implementation.

1

Connect the systems you already use

Bring your financial and operational data into Oculon by connecting directly to the systems your business already runs on.

Explore integrations

2

Define your finance context

Set the metrics, dimensions, drivers, formulas and structures that reflect how your business actually works.

3

Start planning

Start with the planning, modelling or reporting workflow that matters most. Get it working in Oculon, then expand from there as your needs grow.

Request Demo

Oculon vs Legacy FP&A

Built for the speed of modern finance. Legacy FP&A platforms can handle complex planning. Oculon is built for finance teams to build, analyse and adapt as the business moves, with less implementation drag, platform administration and specialist dependency.

How Oculon compares

Both approaches can support sophisticated financial planning. The difference is how quickly finance can get started, adapt the model, understand what changed and act.

Multidimensional modelling

Mature multidimensional modelling

Variables, formulas, drivers, dimensions and hierarchies

Scenario planning

Scenario and version planning

Branch, compare, govern and merge scenarios

Enterprise governance

Mature permissions, controls and audit capabilities

Permissions, versions, approvals, sandboxes and audit history

Time to value

Longer implementation, data mapping and model configuration

Connect your sources, define your model, start planning

Integrations

Integrations can require more mapping, middleware or implementation support

Connect finance and operating systems directly and select the tables and fields you need

Changing the plan

Larger changes can require admins, model builders or reconfiguration

Finance can change drivers, assumptions, dimensions and structures directly

Analysis & root cause

Analysis typically relies on drilling through configured reports and models

Variance → driver → explanation in one workflow

AI & agents

AI is increasingly available, usually within existing planning and reporting workflows

AI understands the financial model, builds scenarios and can propose governed changes

Continuous monitoring

Primarily report- and dashboard-led, with monitoring dependent on configuration

Automatically surfaces material changes, risks and exceptions

Insight → action

Follow-up often continues across separate workflows or execution tools

Move from analysis into scenarios, approvals and governed workflows

Day-to-day administration

Can involve dedicated admins, model builders or platform owners

Designed for finance teams to work directly

Total cost of ownership

Licence + implementation + administration + maintenance + partner or consultant support

Lower implementation and ongoing platform overhead

When should you consider switching?

When updating a planning platform takes more time than decision-making, the tool has become the bottleneck.

Signal 01

The plan is always catching up

Changes in entities, structures or assumptions take too long to reflect in the model.

Signal 02

New questions require new setup

Getting an answer means building another report, view or model before analysis can begin.

Signal 03

Scale creates more overhead

More teams, scenarios and complexity bring more administration, configuration and specialist support.

Signal 04

The real cost keeps growing

Implementation, maintenance, administration and specialist support make the platform increasingly expensive to run.

Questions finance teams ask before switching.

No. Oculon connects to the financial and operating systems you already use, so your source systems can remain in place. Finance can select the data it needs and use it across modelling, planning and analysis.

How long does implementation take?

What happens to our existing models and planning logic?

Do we need a dedicated implementation partner or platform admin?

Can Oculon handle complex and highly customised financial models?

Can non-finance teams use Oculon?

How does Oculon pricing compare with legacy FP&A platforms?

How are changes controlled and audited?

Can AI change our financial models automatically?

Is our financial data secure?

A seamless switch

Switch to a modern finance workspace without replacing the systems your business already runs on or taking on another big-bang implementation.

1

Connect the systems you already use

Bring your financial and operational data into Oculon by connecting directly to the systems your business already runs on.

Explore integrations

2

Define your finance context

Set the metrics, dimensions, drivers, formulas and structures that reflect how your business actually works.

3

Start planning

Start with the planning, modelling or reporting workflow that matters most. Get it working in Oculon, then expand from there as your needs grow.

Request Demo

Page preview · This destination is not built in the local prototype yet.